Mamdani has become the center of new debate and discussion in the international arena by calling for a boycott of Starbucks. His call is mainly considered to be a reflection of the anger surrounding the global political situation, corporate responsibility and human rights issues. Many brands worldwide face various allegations, but the call for a direct boycott of a popular and widely influential brand like Starbucks has caused a strong public reaction. The call has received a huge response, especially on social media, which is further expanding the scope of the movement.

Mamdani argues that when the world’s largest corporations fail to fulfill their social and moral responsibilities, ordinary people’s resistance—such as boycotts—can be one of the most effective ways. Many support his statement because the allegations raised against Starbucks are related to political and human rights. On the other hand, the company claims that it follows neutral business policies and that the allegations are exaggerated or the result of misinterpretation. This conflict has divided public opinion into two camps—on the one hand, the demand for ethical business practices, and on the other, the reality of global trade.

Such boycott movements are not limited to a single brand, but rather draw attention to larger structural problems. Mamdani’s call has sparked new discussions about corporate accountability, especially among the younger generation, who are more active in social justice and human rights issues. Only time will tell how widespread this movement will be in the future, or how Starbucks will respond; but it is certain that the incident has created new pressures on global consumer thinking and corporate policymaking.